How Aristotle Describes 'Greatest Life' in Micomachean Ethics
In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle tries to determine what the very best life consists in, and demonstrate that human action is aimed at eudaimonia. Mill's ethical philosophy is definitely that activities are right if indeed they promote the general amount of joy, wrong if indeed they decrease it. Their respective ideas, eudaimonia and contentment are similar in lots of ways, for instance, they both embrace the thought of quality of happiness in addition to quantity. You will find a fundamental difference between them though, and this relates to the account of others within their doctrines.
From the initial line of the Nicomachean ethics; 'Every fine art and every enquiry, and similarly every actions and pursuit is considered to aim at the right; and because of this the good provides rightly been declared to get that at which all things purpose' (1094a19), Aristotle's ethical philosophy can be concluded. There will be two fundamental aspects to Aristotle's say, which are that human actions is usually to be interpreted with regards to means and ends, and that there surely is one ultimate end of which everything aim. As Woodard says, 'Aristotle is certainly declaring that everything we perform, all our actions are eventually designed to lead us to circumstances of success and well-being', which may be the ultimate end of individual action called 'eudaimonia'.
There's been much debate surrounding the right translation of 'eudaimonia'. It is just a direct transliteration from ANCIENT GREEK LANGUAGE, and had this is 'good fortune', often with unique references to exterior prosperity, in Old Greece. It has sometimes been translated as 'pleasure', but Ross says 'the term 'eudaimonia' is employed to make reference to whatever life s most desirable and satisfying. The